3.8
Owner's of the Canon Camcorder PowerShot gave it a score of 3.8 out of 5. Here's how the scores stacked up:
07/02/09 11:18Canon PowerShot G10 - Digital Camera Reviews & Photography Tips
Page 4 of 23http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-g10-reviews-sample-images-user-manual/
“Photographs taken with ISO 80 to ISO 400 were very much usable, with slow incremental digital
artifacts that were remnants from the work of the noise-reducing algorithm. We found pictures snapped
at ISO 100 to be the most pleasant and natural-looking. At ISO 80, the image was a bit soft, and from
ISO 200, we detected some grittiness in the picture… ”
Rating:
CameraLabs reviews the Canon G10 and writes;
“G10 remains a superb compact camera. It’s built like a brick yet comfortable to use, boasts full manual
control along with a flash hotshoe and RAW recording, has an excellent looking screen, a flexible zoom
range with wide angle capabilities and decent stabilisation, and the potential to deliver images packed
with detail – again so long as you stick to the lowest sensitivities and largest apertures.”
Rating:
CNET.uk reviews the Canon G10 and writes;
“We love the Canon Powershot G10: it looks and feels like a serious camera should, yet makes operation
easy with a selection of controls that aren’t as intimidating as they may initially appear. The Nikon
P6000 adds GPS and wireless connectivity to similar specs, while the Ricoh GX200 is smaller and
cheaper. But both would have to go some way to beat the Canon’s image quality.”
Rating:
ByThom compares the Panasonic LX3 VS Nikon P6000 VS Canon G10 and writes;
“If you need pixels, you need the Canon, hands down. If you need the fast, wide, defect-free lens, you
need the Panasonic. You don’t need the Coolpix…. For my mark, the Canon comes the closest for my
types of use, though the Panasonic provides capabilities that I sometimes need and stays in the bag, too.
The Nikon will get sold off and I’ll go back to waiting for Nikon to design a decent compact.”
Rating: N/A
ePhotozine reviews the Canon G10 and writes;
“ISO80 is lovely with sharp detail on the petals. This detail doesn’t leave but problems have started to
leak through at ISO200. To be fair, this is at full size enlargement and for me, the image doesn’t become
unbearable until ISO1600 anyway. While ISO800 has the purple blobs in the shadow area and a distinct
loss of detail in the petals, it’s not threatening enough to worry over..”
Find Your Products By Category
Please Login
